🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.