🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to resume nuclear discussions with the United States on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue produced results, and revealed fresh requests had originated from mediators to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the global atomic watchdog to access attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Walking a Difficult Path

Araghchi is navigating a difficult route since Iran does not want be perceived to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger militarily and psychologically from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Prior Discussions Suddenly Terminated

The prior phases of discussions between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president claiming the facilities had been obliterated. Following this, Western states employed their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives stated three times they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Position

Iranian officials stated the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems very probable the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if discussions resume.

The US president last week claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives claim they are not yet receiving coherent offers from America either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of inactivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a show.

Political Stance

In his remarks to the conference, intended to paint the US as a controlling nation that abuses the concept of global regulations, Araghchi stated the fortnight-long engagement showed the dispute could not be resolved by combat operations. He stated the attacks started with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were mounted with full US knowledge and cooperation, making trust hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Remains the Final Solution

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had always tried to enforce their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and stays the final resolution to settle conflicts, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be respected."

"Provided that they address to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will obtain a reply in the same approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the struggle of restoration and rebuilding, the foreign minister said he was confident Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We acquired multiple understandings from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He added: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is important is the determination of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but did not succeed to destroy. The nation of Iran have developed more powerful, more integrated, and more backing of the administration and the country in the wake of this attack."